Display:
It is not hard to see the Democrats of early 2010 in a similar danger to the Republicans of early 2006.

Except that the Republicans are more loyal or at least better followers - they gave Bush 6 years and Obama only two.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jan 23rd, 2010 at 06:09:59 AM EST
This kind of friction is good for a party.  "Shut up and obey" isn't a very democratic message, and the larger electorate probably doesn't like it too much.

That said, if the fractiousness turns into paralysis you're screwed.

by danps (dan at pruningshears (dot) us) on Sat Jan 23rd, 2010 at 06:16:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I an not taking this kind of 'loyalty' as a necessarily positive quality. But I have observed a characteristic feature of right-wing activists is an ability to 'get with the program' whereas left-wing activists tend to fractiousness.

I was counting years from the presidential election. Clinton also lost control of the Congress after 2 years, but the Republicans enjoyed control for 12 years in 1994-2006 whereas the Democrats have only had 4 in 2006-10.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jan 23rd, 2010 at 06:21:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series