Display:
we seem to basically agree on the underlying problem and its depth, but disagree on some of the reaction to Obama's approach to them.

So, what should have been done? What could Obama have done better, in the existing environment? If not, what's the game plan now, and what can be the expectations?

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 04:01:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No I think the important disagreement is tactical. What should the "left opposition" do in the current situation. From my point of view, vitriolic attacks on the personal character of the Obama administration is tactical failure. The US "left", petulantly demanding to be heard and bewailing its powerlessness and the betrayal and cowardice of the moderates it supported for office seems to me to be on a path the only assists the corporate/military right. The idea that if you insult Obama enough, something good will happen strikes me as nuts. What needs to happen now is concerted efforts to (a) win lower electoral office and (b) market clear and compelling ideas for reform.
by rootless2 on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 11:20:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure where you see the vitriol in this diary.

It seems to me that you're importing a meta-controversy from Agent Orange to a forum where both the discourse, conventional wisdom and a large fraction of the users are simply not involved in that discussion - neither on your side nor on the side(s) you critique.

That's certainly your prerogative, and one of the advantages of this type of open message board is that discussions can migrate like that. But you might want to bear in mind that quite a large number of us are not Kossacks.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 03:17:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not in the diary - in the comments, which he's responded to head-on.  Everything he's alluding to when making generalized statement's about the left's tactics may not be in this exchange, but he's certainly not importing attitudes from elsewhere -- he's addressing them here where they've cropped up.

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 06:05:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Except that if you review the chronology of this comment thread, you'll see that rootless came rather early to the action. With a "reality check" that included a number of items that ranged from spurious to outright garbage. And the items that were sound were, well, not impressive. As I said upthread, you don't get brownie points for not being Bush.

When people then proceed to complain about his "reality check" he pulls this bullshit about pissing on Obama's parade.

It's rather hard to avoid discussing the shortcomings of the Obama administration and focus on the areas of American political life that are more amenable to activist change, when the other party to the discussion insists on turning the discussion into a defence of Obama's record.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 07:46:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I read and participated in the thread in real time.  Since yesterday.  Calling his points spurious, outright garbage, and sound but not impressive are, again, all your opinion, not fact.  I'm also pretty sure no one's much concerned about your brownie point system, so declaring what does and doesn't get points doesn't end the discussion.

Further, this is a massive thread with, imo, some rather good discussion in it.  I don't see anyone 'insisting' on turning it into any particular thing and I certainly wouldn't characterize it as a 'defense of Obama's record' in its overall tone.  You, however, seem to be insisting that you want to discuss his 'shortfalls' and that's fine -- no one's stopping you.  But don't be all aggrieved if people don't agree with your critiques and interpretations.

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes

by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 08:28:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Izzy
Calling his points spurious, outright garbage, and sound but not impressive are, again, all your opinion, not fact.

You have made the same comment to me in this thread. It is most certainly true. So much so that it doesn't warrant constant repetition. The state of our understanding of human affairs is such that what we can establish as facts are usually insufficient for decisions that are applicable to the most important issues. So we organize these facts around theories and generate "beliefs" which are the basis for most of our actions. But we need to always be aware that our beliefs are, at best, tentative and be prepared to revise them on the basis of new information.

These sorts of "beliefs" are qualitatively different from those of the religious, who crave certainty and too often believe they have it. But yes, my characterization of Obama is an opinion based on many observations and impressions that have been organized into a working belief. As are yours and those of rootless.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 10:41:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, perhaps if people would stop throwing around their opinions as though they're fact and using words like "The Idol" as descriptors, then I wouldn't have to keep pointing this out.  

We're not anywhere NEAR a consensus of 'impressions that have been organized into a working belief' on any of these opinions, so until we are, those of you who have hardened your opinion into belief are going to have to expect arguments from us non-believers.  And until you stop stating your opinions like they're the accepted working belief, I'll keep reminding you that they're not.

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes

by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 11:03:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
They are my working beliefs. Take them as such. And I would never presume to speak for you, or Jerome, or Mig or Jake or.....  Putting IMO after everything I say gets a little tiresome.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 11:56:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I copied a comment I had made that fit this diary better than it fit its original location. Rootless began with the "your using Maureen Down's meme, you're following a Frank Lutz meme" etc. My Gawd!  You would think we were all back at a 40s gathering of CPUSA folks arguing over whose line to follow. I didn't even bother to object that I don't read Maureen Dowd or follow Frank Lutz. Rootless may have gotten that from Orange, of which I only read a few recommended diaries.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 10:26:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The very nature of memes means that you don't have to follow Dowd or Lutz to pick up their memes.  If you're repeating a meme or a right-wing talking point, don't you think it should be pointed out?

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 11:06:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If it contains truth, I don't care who else has said it. Things should be evaluated on their merits, not on the basis of who has advocated them. Perhaps an impossible standard but one I try to follow. After all, the Devil has his points.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Mon Jan 25th, 2010 at 12:00:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series