The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
US agribusiness subsidy is a huge target, for example.
But my fundamental critique of the US "progressives" is that their message doesn't seem to have any hopes of having a positive effect. I mean, telling the reformist government that it sucks may be therapeutic, but what is it supposed to accomplish?
These "progressives" (a term which means not so much to me) may not be all that convinced that Obama is a reformer. Clearly that would seem to be both Krugman and Stiglitz case.
We'll see. Though, if Obama were really in the pocket of the interests he's'going after, it'd'be far easier for him to score a few victories... I would be ashamed to admit that I had risen from the ranks. When I rise it will be with the ranks, and not from them Eugene Debs
Is he purposely trying to commit political suicide? Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
following the clinton playbook, keep him away from cigars... "It's very hard to see what is kept invisible" Roseanne Barr
The right doesn't have that problem. Their vision of the future is endlessly sunny. Oil, we just need to drill, baby drill. Global warming, heck it is 30 below outside, Jobs, we just need to lower taxes.
Their arguments are infantile but they carry the day amongst a population that can only be described as delusional.
It's hard to sell sustainability. It's hard to tell people that US cities are unsustainable. Suburbs in the US will prove the costliest bet ever made in human history.
It would seem to me that you are treating a loose group of people as an organization. Individuals and organizations act, but a loose group of people do not act, they react.
I would say in general they are reacting to feeling let down by the promises of the campaign. Which in turn is predictable after a campaign that successfully held up empty words like "hope" and "change" and let the voters project their favourite policies on it. After winning on such terms it would have took great propaganda efforts - constant campaigning if you will - to keep the supporters to see their favourite policies as the long term result of the actual policies enacted. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by DoDo - May 20 7 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 13 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by gmoke - May 17 1 comment
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 207 comments
by gmoke - May 171 comment
by ARGeezer - May 1613 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments