Display:
What can I do to give this a bit more punch?

Photobucket

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 11:13:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Draw an UFO under the Moon? ;-) I don't know (and am not an expert). Maybe some red. Maybe it's good as it is.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 12:18:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
an UFO

a UFO... why does this typo happen to me.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Feb 1st, 2010 at 03:23:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know how it is meant to be written actually.  I tend to write it as if I were saying the letters (therefore a you-eff-oh). I don't know if that is correct.

I suppose in the most literal way if it is a vowel then it should be an, not a.

I always make the mistake with 'historical' too.

Ad astra per aspera

by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Mon Feb 1st, 2010 at 06:10:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Was this made the same day you met deep snow North of Cardiff?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 12:19:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I took this on friday, it snowed that night.  I'll go an find a snowy valley pic.  It wasn't deep snow though by the time I got around to driving back.

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 01:17:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Try Photoshop <equalize>: that'll give you a bit more saturation and a bit more of a luminance kick. Equalize is a bit brutal and unsubtle. First open the picture, then copy it into a layer above then equalize it. Next use the opacity slider on the equalized image and lower it down to about 50 %, so the original picture comes through - you can experiment too.

That's the quick way. You can also play around with the brightness/contrast, different RGB curves etc, colour balance - but most people soon get lost because they don't know what they are aiming for, but they'll know it when they see it ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 12:53:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Would you give it a try yourself? (I tried myself, best results on the sky part were by adding some red and then some saturation and extra contrast, but that spoiled other parts of the picture. And I like the original anyway.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 01:23:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
DoDo,
I like the original also.
Trying to work a whole image sometimes works less positively on one element of the image while ameliorating another.
In the example, I took the liberty of altering,(only because I saw you wanted Mr.Sven, to have a go at it) by separating the sky & the pasture, & working on them separately.
With the selection "lasso" set at 10, I just followed the tree line roughly & around the bottom.
You can work the bottom, then invert the selection to modify the sky.
By doing it this way you have control over the elements you want to work on.

The difference between theists and atheists is that the atheists don't set the theists on fire for refusing to agree with them.
by Knucklehead on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 10:38:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A little this & that.
I don`t know how to draw a UFO.
 NOT MY jan29

The difference between theists and atheists is that the atheists don't set the theists on fire for refusing to agree with them.
by Knucklehead on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 10:30:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh just take a photo of a UFO and add it in with layers if you can't draw one.  Thanks for playing about with the image for me :)

Ad astra per aspera
by In Wales (inwales aaat eurotrib.com) on Mon Feb 1st, 2010 at 03:06:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series