Display:
Try Photoshop <equalize>: that'll give you a bit more saturation and a bit more of a luminance kick. Equalize is a bit brutal and unsubtle. First open the picture, then copy it into a layer above then equalize it. Next use the opacity slider on the equalized image and lower it down to about 50 %, so the original picture comes through - you can experiment too.

That's the quick way. You can also play around with the brightness/contrast, different RGB curves etc, colour balance - but most people soon get lost because they don't know what they are aiming for, but they'll know it when they see it ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 12:53:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Would you give it a try yourself? (I tried myself, best results on the sky part were by adding some red and then some saturation and extra contrast, but that spoiled other parts of the picture. And I like the original anyway.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 01:23:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
DoDo,
I like the original also.
Trying to work a whole image sometimes works less positively on one element of the image while ameliorating another.
In the example, I took the liberty of altering,(only because I saw you wanted Mr.Sven, to have a go at it) by separating the sky & the pasture, & working on them separately.
With the selection "lasso" set at 10, I just followed the tree line roughly & around the bottom.
You can work the bottom, then invert the selection to modify the sky.
By doing it this way you have control over the elements you want to work on.

The difference between theists and atheists is that the atheists don't set the theists on fire for refusing to agree with them.
by Knucklehead on Sun Jan 31st, 2010 at 10:38:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series