Display:
David King admits to speculation over source of climate science emails | Environment | guardian.co.uk

The government's former chief scientist has backed away from his sensational claim that a foreign intelligence agency or wealthy US lobbyists were behind the hacking and release of controversial emails between climate scientists.

Sir David King admitted he possessed no inside information about the leaks of embarrassing emails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, and had merely been speculating on material already in the public domain. His remarks to a journalist had been a "side-issue", he said.



Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Feb 1st, 2010 at 01:09:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
that's interesting, cos he mentioned that he'd been involved with security services enough to recognise the sophistication of the hack required resources unavailable to the average trouble maker.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Feb 1st, 2010 at 05:09:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
hmmm Ive not seen any particular evidence that government and security services have any particular advantage in sophisticated hacks over non governmental trouble makers.  Or any reason why the UEA hack required particularly great resources. I can see that its possible that, depending on the network design, it may have been that three  machines inside the network may have needed to be accessed to make the attack work. But none of that presupposes that it must have been government or corporate  agents.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Feb 1st, 2010 at 06:55:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series