Display:
Berlusconi's personal political entity cannot be considered a party, much less as you describe (a modicum of ideology or, at the least, an ideological "container.")

Candidates- appointees is more appropriate- for B's entity must correspond to current celebrity stereotypes. There are several other criteria, such as the "Indira Gandhi ploy" which consists of using or acquiring a famous surname or name that attracts votes. The Berlusconi variant consists of choosing people with the same name of popular sport's figure (Paolo Rossi), a prominent philosopher (Bobbio), an historical opposition leader or similar to foreign figures (Giorgio Bucci who looks and dresses just like George Bush) or look-a-likes: there is presently a candidate who looks like Tony Blair, just as there have been Ridges and Michael Jacksons (before his trials...)

In effect his political entity aspires to be an all-inclusive sit-com microcosm while in the back room his thugs engineer an authoritarian state in the name of freedoms.

B reviews candidates for their telegenic value. He substituted one of his grovelers in Umbria because his ears stick out. He gave him the name of a plastic surgeon. B describes opposition candidates as ugly and smelly as if his manic compulsion for commercial brands of cleanliness are the all-exclusive Norm of his modern Italic nation. No hairy armpits, sweat, or sagging tits for the great Italic race!

As for the "rose quota" as it's called here, the only criteria appears to be how hot they are in Putin's bed. It's definitely a slight at his ex-wife who had blocked his previous attempts to appoint his lays to power.

The "slut" factor, along with the "blackmail" factor and the "shameless groveler" factor, are the cement, the essence, of berlusconi's personal political entity. Tits and ass go a long way in Italy's present day political arena.

by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Tue Feb 2nd, 2010 at 12:58:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's interesting.

But I still don't understand one thing: any political operation depends on a lot of little people doing the crap, and in most countries most of them do it in the expectation of eventually earning a payoff - often a sure shot at a seat somewhere.

What's the payoff for Berlu's underlings?

The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman

by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Tue Feb 2nd, 2010 at 03:26:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
De la Boetie described the situation four centuries ago. Machiavelli, Mazzarin have thrown in their observations too. Voluntary servitude gets its high from serving and groveling. The mere joy of serving the despot is satisfactory in itself. It is interesting to watch over the years the levels to which individuals will crawl to simply serve the Egoarc with little more than a pat on the shoulder. Often a minion will simply be thrown out after having gratified the interests of berlusconi's clique. I recall Cirielli, a oneshot Sicilian lawyer, who devised a law to cut statuatory limitations for individuals with a clean slate, smothered in get-tough sauce for recidives. He did his job and got sacked. It's much like Louis XIV: It's an honour and a privilege to carry his royal chamber pot out back where fawning doctors can admire its content.
by de Gondi (publiobestia aaaatttthotmaildaughtusual) on Tue Feb 2nd, 2010 at 04:26:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series