Display:
Mass media exposure has only existed for a very short time, and has frozen languages (by lowering diversity) more than anything else. Shortening of words and sentences ? not necessarily. Languages with short words create multisyllables, sooner or later.

Again, as long as the language can express advanced thoughts, how it expresses them is of no importance. All language, given enough vocabulary, can express those thoughts ; the "evolution" of language is never that a language dies because it can't express thoughts that another can, unlike biological evolution. There is no "fitness" of languages.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 11:51:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Evolutionary fitness is not about "change or go extinct" either (though such methapors were common in the popularisation of natural selection that also led to Social Darwinism). So, while I'd agree with you that most language change is not adaptation to the environment, the shortening of words or the import of words to describe f.e. artifacts of newly acqwuired technologies (from the plowshare to the cell phone) could be considered adaptation.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 03:27:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The thing is, evolution of species is a specific kind of evolution with specific conditions. Thinking that it is, and has to be, similar to the evolution of other things, such as social mores, economic systems, languages, leads to oversimplifications and errors.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Sat Feb 6th, 2010 at 06:27:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series