Not at all. The argument is that the system is inherently broken, so partial reforms that actually help people are great and should not be discarded in the name of some supposedly "real" reform that will magically create an island of justice in the sea of exploitation. The idea that one can reform US health insurance as if the basic operation of the US economy did not favor corporate power is laughable.

Remember the context of the argument is that Moyers/Taibbi/Hamsher etc. are arguing that a health reform bill that improves lives of tens of millions should be discarded.