Display:
well initial back of an envelope calculation that might be entirely wrong says 20.7 TWh

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Jan 5th, 2010 at 11:11:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hm? You must use a very high capacity factor.

I just started into reading your link; there's a graph saying "Wind & wave" was at 7.1 TWh in 2008.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Jan 5th, 2010 at 11:56:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
More precise figures for wind only later: 4.236 TWh in 2006, 5.288 TWh in 2007, 7.114 TWh in 2008. That was 1.5 resp. 1.9% of supply.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Jan 5th, 2010 at 12:14:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Had a quick flick, saw that wind was 5.5% of renewables, and renewables were 10.3% of supply, created total in TWh from claimed output of nuclear stations which they claim to be 13%  of the total of UK the UKs nuclear sector might have been overstating their output.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Jan 5th, 2010 at 12:30:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series