I'd been reading Equus, which has (among other things) "abstracts" of horses, disturbingly like the "abstracts" of women's bodies you see in posters aimed at the arty teenage market. I've never understood the "abstract" term. They look like details to me, close enough that you only see part of the subject. I presume this is due to my deficient artistic education.
It's hard to make a red (cranberry and apple) chutney not look completely disgusting in a photo. I think this works.
Yes, it does.
A magazine shot would probably have some bread or something else to add context. A tub of stuff on its own doesn't hold enough information to parse the contents without extra hints.
And it's easy to make food shots look disgusting without trying.
Sam make that at home?
recipe please? ~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~
THINGS Go Better With Coke
A FRIEND INDEED
LOVE IS A MANY SPLENDORED THING
A SILK PURSE
BARS DO NOT A PRISON MAKE
PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS
BEWARE OF THOSE BEARING FRUIT
WHO PUT THE OVERALLS (In Mrs. Murphy`s Chowder)
Those Who Live In Glass Houses
FLIES & VINEGAR
A BIRD IN THE HAND
It`s Bark is Much Worse
A Snail`s Space The difference between theists and atheists is that the atheists don't set the theists on fire for refusing to agree with them.
