Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
Yes, this is the case.  But it would be a constitutional violation of the first order for a municipality to claim that public demonstrations were prohibited for lack of funds to police them.  They would be simply ordered by courts to let them go on without police or to find the funds to make it work by reducing something else or increasing fees and taxes.  The explicit right in the US constitution provides a means of finding a consensus that public protest has priority over most other things that government might be interested in doing. Maybe that consensus just doesn't exist in the UK.
by santiago on Tue Nov 16th, 2010 at 12:16:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I thought it was easy to police protests in the US, just place the cops around the free speach zone. (Or has that practise been abolished after Bush?)

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES!
by A swedish kind of death on Wed Nov 17th, 2010 at 07:46:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
LOL
by jjellin on Wed Nov 17th, 2010 at 02:35:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series