The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
a) Politically engaged people who for various reasons hated him from the start, but some of whom voted for him anyways e.g. the hard core Hilary types.
b) Politically engaged progressives who were a bit cynical, but genuinely expected him to be better than he was.
c)Non-engaged voters turned off by the enduring godawful mess that is the American economy.
The first two groups are numerically small and I don't think he could have done anything about a and most of b turned out for him anyways, at least judging by my anecdata. The same highly scientific evidence does suggest a significantly lower rate of volunteering and donating among the second group.
The third group is the big one. Some of it is in the nature of turnout differences between presidential and midterm elections, some would have deserted due to the lack of an economic miracle, and some he lost through his own lacklustre performance. That was decisive in the PA and IL Senate races and a handful of other statehouse and House ones. Feingold and a bunch of non Senate candidates would have been tossups, some of which would have fallen the right way.
On NYC, maybe. All progressives here with a higher education know people who work in the financial industry. They can be nice people, strongly progressive ones have actually been sighted. There's also probably a corner of our mind that thinks that the amounts of cash Wall St rakes in sucks for the country, but is so huge that it's enough for a genuine trickle down effect on a local level.
He never gave any indication of being any more progressive than absolutely necessary to establish his brand image, and whenever moving to match the bids of his main pre-primary rivals, consistently picked a spot on the right hand side of the scrum. It was obvious that he would govern from well right of his primary positions.
I mean, good lord, if I saw it, and said so before the 2008 election, it had to be pretty damn clear to anyone who focused on the actual tinkering little policy positions rather than the soaring rhetoric about the magnitude of the challenges we face. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
A blisteringly common mistake.
The flaw is in democracy itself. It demands too much of the average citizen. Align culture with our nature.
Its an awfully old governmental system we have in the US. Yurpeans tend to have more modern 19th century institutions, either by evolution or tearing down and reconstruction of Republics. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
if I saw it, and said so before the 2008 election,
Since I never hoped that a Hedge Fund Democrat would be anything else, while unhappy with his economic decisions, I was never really disappointed in them.
It is the moderate authoritarianism of the Justice Department that is disappointing to me, since the Democratic supporting Hedge Fund managers tend to be socially liberal. The Obama administration talks a moderate socially liberal game plan, but regularly delivers moderate authoritarian plays.
Since those are things that can not be blocked by Senate Filibuster, all of the "Senate did not let me" excuses fall away for those. If it was a political calculation to avoid sparking culture ways, it was a foolish one: culture wars are not caused by the talking points, they are caused by something else and the talking points are to mobilize the ground troops.
But since the Health Care debate and efforts to protect Wall Street from destroying itself were always bound to attract massive money to mobilize those ground troops, there was nothing to be lost in doing things to make socially liberal types happy.
So that is the disappointment. I knew he was a economic neoliberal, but its been disappointing to see that he was not a socially liberal economic neoliberal
Its like keeping the large number of bad bits of a European Liberal Party platform and tossing the smaller number of good bits to the side. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments