Donate | 66 comments (66 topical, editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: Donate (none / 0)

All this is ridiculous and so obviously made up. Once has to be really stupid or mean/not to see it/sorry guys.
Not to mention all the farce with consensual-non consensual sex with or without condom in Sweden so called law that has gone too far in regulating all the aspects of life, including sex. I am a women and sex is either consensual or it's not consensual. There is no other way. If it is consensual there is no crime there...it's simple as that. Those two sluts were not forced in to the sex,not phisicaly or mentally , by their own telling. If condom broke it's a bad luck , what a lunatic can say that he broke it intentionally / go figure/.The other one by her own words asked for the condom to be used and consented to have sex after she was told he is not going to use it. And then after doing a party for him and all that stuff she went in to the police to ask for advice. What a slut.
What's wrong with you people who do not see things as obvious as this?
On the other hand you keep telling us that we should wait for courts to decide what's truth while man who may be very well innocent IS IN PRISON...denied his freedom while he is defending himself...WTF you are trying to tell us here...

by vbo on Fri Dec 10th, 2010 at 10:34:44 PM EST

Re: Donate (none / 1)

That is pretty ugly vbo. I'll note that you refer to a woman who may be making a false charge of rape or may be the victim of rape as a 'slut', while you do not do the same w/r to Assange, who may be the victim of a false charge or may be a rapist, but is by a gender neutral version of your standards twice as much of a 'slut' as the women. The news reports vary, but according to a number of them one of women told Assange to stop and he refused, i.e. she expressly refused to consent to sex. I'm curious, what do you think that the woman should do in this sort of case - gouge the man's eyes out perhaps? In that case would she unquestionably be telling the truth and innocent of aggravated assault and bodily harm by reason of self defense?

by MarekNYC on Sat Dec 11th, 2010 at 01:54:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Donate (none / 0)

i.e. she expressly refused to consent to sex.
---------
If so it was too late cause she already was an actor in CONSENSUAL sex. All tho I may think of such a thing that she could push him and stop sex immediately if she wanted him to stop really. It would not hurt him I suppose. That I suppose is one that had condom broken. What about the other one that was told that he is not using condom and still agreed to sex only to go to the police later
This all story is BS and yes those women are sluts in my eyes, not because they had sex with a man they did not have a chance to know better / considering a short time he spent with them / but because they try to make rape case of something that clearly was not rape. Why they are doing so I can imagine but really am not sure of the reason.
As for him, he is in this trouble and mess also because he is a slut of a kind /as a man who is sleeping around with women he does not know much about / and in a way he deserve it. What bothers me is the fact that he is not just another guy that sleeps around /and yet without condom, not to mention fact that he can contract diseases / but he is Wikileaks and as story of those women smell bad so the whole judicial procedure is bloody smelly. He should be able to defend himself as a free man. He was not violent by telling of those women. Instead he is in prison. If he is deported and if it's a truth that in Sweden there is no bail he could spend pretty long time in prison / maybe that's why they chosen Sweden for this exercise / and in the end they may find that he is innocent...but the purpose of all this will be already done...he will be removed from the scene for a long time so that they can destroy Wikileaks. I am not going to even mention what can happen to him in prison / real rape and even worse maybe even death by another prisoner... which is a common thing /.
But whatever they do they will not stop these leaks ... if they even want it. While the world is going upside down whit criminal finance transactions of the few, people are concentrated on Wikileaks...that must be good entertainment for the masses.
I really can't see how all this seems to be OK with you...

by vbo on Sat Dec 11th, 2010 at 05:32:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Donate | 66 comments (66 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

A short note on extreme flooding (wonkish)

Catholic Bishops fighting losing battle in Ireland

A shift of sexual mores

Tour of the German offshore wind sector

Record flood on the Danube

Utopian Ideas - Digital Infrastructure

Histories of Neoliberalism?

Woolwich killing: responses

Recent Diaries

Catholic Bishops fighting losing battle in Ireland

A short note on extreme flooding (wonkish)

A shift of sexual mores

Tuesday Open Thread

Utopian Ideas - Digital Infrastructure

Tour of the German offshore wind sector

Record flood on the Danube

Histories of Neoliberalism?

No Desertec for Europe

The metro revolution

Woolwich killing: responses

Methane Cell Phone Sniffers

What price, Irish recovery?

How the "riots" in Stockholm started

One lone paper?

Fiscal and Organizational Capacity of States and Sovereignty

Austrians finally discover hyperinflation - in Diablo III

Rail News Blogging #25

Pentecost steam

Standing on the Shoulders of Giants - Europe and the Mongol...

Occasional Series