We should build a europe wide HSR net for people and rededicate the regular lines for freight.
And local passengers. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
There is slowness from lower priority related stops, but the latter are not due to the number of passenger trains, but the speed differential -- and that more vs. expresses than stopping trains. In that sense, replacing expresses with high-speed trains on dedicated lines would indeed be the way to go. I note though that due to noise issues, currently ever more countries return to the (IMO bad) idea to put freight trains on the high-speed lines (because those are avoiding lines), and hope that advanced signalling will improve capacity.
Meanwhile, European railfreight is also slow due to a low top speed of trains, inefficient switching when trains are re-arranged, and (considering the distances at which rail is most competitive) above all borders (which are often technological borders). There are improvements in each field, though. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
This makes the average trip shorter, which disadvantages rail over truck given the current underpricing of truck fuel.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.