This was one such column
You may think this psycho-philosophical twaddle but it has direct consequences for policy. If individual, family and social conscience are to play a big part in public welfare, a measure of visible distress is required to refresh social concern. If we are to be spurred to provide for ourselves, our families and our communities, we have to believe that nobody else will. Those who govern must be unsqueamish enough to tolerate this; and honest enough to explain.
Here, this eminently civilised and urbane man, cold bloodedly advocates that the welfare system should be shut down to allow private charity to rise up and replace it. Never has the pitilessness of the right been so starkly exposed that even he thinks it a sensible way forward.
If I felt it would touch him , I'd have sent him Jerome's essay on charity. But it would be a futile gesture keep to the Fen Causeway
Pity he didn't learn anything.
Since then he has carved out a niche as a columnist and political humourist; mostly gently right wing, always humane. I've always liked his work and had come to broadly imagine that just cos he put a cross in the wrong box, he was basically a fair minded person. I guess that was why it was such a shock, I would have expected it of Redwood or Hannan and dismissed it. But Matthew Parris !!?? keep to the Fen Causeway
cut to the bone these attitudes combine to get these sick you-know-whats off on seeing suffering in the less fortunate. dress it up, sure, but it's like alligator tears.
i makes them think they must be doing something right, and gives them unlimited permission to concern troll like this.
spinechillingly and enragingly patronising... the kind you feel like saying 'serves him right' when his own foibles are exposed.
yuk ~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~