Display:
feeling slightly bored this afternoon, I decided to check out some Matthew Parris columns I haven't read. Now Matthews is a Tory, a genuine compassionate conservative if somewhat infected by Thatcherite values. Yet he is easily the most entertaining writer on the foibles of the British political scene, he's like a pair of comfortable slippers you wear by the fire, but just occasionally one of the pins that hold him together come loose and jab you in the foot.

This was one such column

You may think this psycho-philosophical twaddle but it has direct consequences for policy. If individual, family and social conscience are to play a big part in public welfare, a measure of visible distress is required to refresh social concern. If we are to be spurred to provide for ourselves, our families and our communities, we have to believe that nobody else will. Those who govern must be unsqueamish enough to tolerate this; and honest enough to explain.

Here, this eminently civilised and urbane man, cold bloodedly advocates that the welfare system should be shut down to allow private charity to rise up and replace it. Never has the pitilessness of the right been so starkly exposed that even he thinks it a sensible way forward.

If I felt it would touch him , I'd have sent him Jerome's essay on charity. But it would be a futile gesture

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Feb 2nd, 2010 at 01:23:44 PM EST
It was Matthew Parris who, as an arrogant young Tory MP, tried to and failed to live for a week on unemployment benefit in the 1980's. It was one of the the early, and still one of the best examples of reality TV.

Pity he didn't learn anything.

by Sassafras on Tue Feb 2nd, 2010 at 01:28:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I rather thought it was the making of him. Until then he'd been a pretty ghastly ultra, which was one of the reasons he was selected for hte programme. After his failure he recognised for the first time that such political brutality had real human consequences and he lost his faith somewhat. I was unsurprised when he left parliament.

Since then he has carved out a niche as a columnist and political humourist; mostly gently right wing, always humane. I've always liked his work and had come to broadly imagine that just cos he put a cross in the wrong box, he was basically a fair minded person. I guess that was why it was such a shock, I would have expected it of Redwood or Hannan and dismissed it. But Matthew Parris !!??

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Feb 2nd, 2010 at 01:44:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
closet sadism, very familiar to most kids growing up in the yookay, i guess.

cut to the bone these attitudes combine to get these sick you-know-whats off on seeing suffering in the less fortunate. dress it up, sure, but it's like alligator tears.

i makes them think they must be doing something right, and gives them unlimited permission to concern troll like this.

spinechillingly and enragingly patronising... the kind you feel like saying 'serves him right' when his own foibles are exposed.

yuk

~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Feb 2nd, 2010 at 05:54:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series