Were you laughing when you typed that? I hope so. 'cause we all know "stakeholder" entered the lexicon of polite conversation from the mouths of corporate management consultants attempting to conscript persons having no legal recourse over the governance of corporate operations in intra-industry propaganda wars.

Moreover, shareholders of public- and private-traded corporations most certainly pay "user fees" to own an interest in future income of the corporation, the property right of which to redeem or re-sell.

A joint share company is entirely the wrong metaphor for a country, Magic.

Country? Certainly you meant to type jurisdiction, even nation. Country is passé, déclassé among persons in certain quarters who believe civilized people do not organize themselves according to either their geographical location or boundaries.

When officers of state --an incorporated, formally established trust, continuously operating according to by-laws-- unilaterally declares a person a "citizen" of the state and exercises state "interests" in the social and economic activity, liberty, and life of said person so as to benefit the ongoing concerns of the bureaucracy, then said person most certainly is, voluntarily or involuntarily, and represents a share of the state enterprise.

Presumably, enfranchised citizens, or "shareholders," may exercise their rights to control state governance.

Incarcerated, minor, institutionalized, flora and fauna persons are stakeholders.

Unless you can make some statements in joint-share-company space which map relatively faithfully to country space.

say what?

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.