Display:
When full-scale experiments begin in 2026, the machine should produce ten times the power it consumes.

When they can extract 20% of that power as usable power they might have something, but they will likely have to extract significantly more to operate at scale, as 80% of 100 Megawatts would be a lot of "waste" energy, presuming that most of it would be thermal energy. The efficiency would seem to be a major limit on cycle time. Not very practical if one or two cycles melts or disables part of the machine. I don't have any idea how this will be done. Some sort of macro quantum efficiency?

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Feb 7th, 2010 at 07:53:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I remain convinced that stray particles from the reactions will shred the containment vessels requiring regular replacement. and those things will be just as hot as any other nuclear waste.

If practical fusion is a technological Friedman unit away (50 years), they're basically admitting they don't have a clue how they're gonna do it. Might as well work on the Star Drive.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Feb 7th, 2010 at 08:12:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series