Display:
Flood those parts of Australia that are below sea level. the evaporation would surely change the game regarding rain in the interior.

there are a lot of ways to promote agriculture using desalinated seawater, even if you only use evaporation methods.  Keep the water in the system by using greenhousing.

Australia could probably end up utilizing its whole coast for 10km inland if it wanted to.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Feb 8th, 2010 at 05:33:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A lot of the coast is a) a long way above the sea (100m or more) b) on terrible soil c) a long way from transport networks d) relatively untouched wilderness.

re flooding lake eyre, it would probably be an environmental disaster, and my climate scientist friend says it would have negligible effect on rainfall (consider the rainfall north of perth, which has a large ocean providing the aforementioned evaporation).

Using evaporative desal in greenhouses is a great idea, and one I've promoted to farmers in the past.  But it's too far out for them and too far in for scientists.  And it only makes sense for locally scarce foods (e.g. bananas in WA) given the cost of greenhouses over fields.

by njh on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 05:29:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks, I was suspecting as much about the topography of Australia...
by Nomad on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 05:38:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 05:47:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Australian bananas are so far unaffected by the wilt, and greenhouse growing makes control of such problems simpler.  Tomatoes are another good option.
by njh on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 08:39:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series