Display:
Find it strange that corporation use accrual accounting and nobody says nothing yet governments are analyzed using cash accounting.  If corporations were held to the same "standard" they'd be in receivership.

 

by ATinNM on Fri Feb 5th, 2010 at 12:49:23 PM EST
It's worse. At least corporate balance sheets have equity.

The closest a nation has to equity is notes and coin, and of course, QE, which is analogous to a redeemable preference share.

I reckon - and both Taleb and Buiter are making noises along these lines - that the solution to the credit crunch lies in a debt/equity swap on a cosmic scale. Just not equity as we know it, Jim.

It could be a sort of a once and for all Jubilee, if you think about it.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sun Feb 7th, 2010 at 06:21:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Distributing some form of equity in/for government and other Public bodies and functions seems, to me, a route to disaster.  Major corporations already have de facto control over the government, at least here in the US.  Giving them de jure control as well fills me with dread.
by ATinNM on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 01:00:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You mean that only governments debts and not their assets are counted? And what with the comparison with GDP?

Me thinks it is propaganda to create the proper climate for neolib reform.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Mon Feb 8th, 2010 at 09:02:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You mean that only governments debts and not their assets are counted?

Essentially, although there's a bit more to it.

by ATinNM on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 12:30:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series