Display:
Consumption was for total energy use, not electricity. This was deliberate, since I see no way of actually lowering CO2 emissions significantly without electrifying nearly all energy use. Should have clarified.
The square meter yield was taken from the bavarian solar plant, since that was the first real world figure I could find - Yield per-square-of panel is not the same as yield per - square of plant.
by Thomas on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 10:38:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Electrifying heating and transportation improves energy efficiency by up to an order of magnitude.

That needs to be put into your calculations too.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 11:22:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Consumption was for total energy use

Then you moved the goalposts rather far from supplying electricity to the Ruhr area industry :-)

electrifying nearly all energy use

As JakeS said, such electrifying can improve energy efficiency greatly, lowering the generating capacity needed. I add that solar thermal (which is spreading rapidly in Germany) and geothermal (which I see as significant by 2030) can give heat energy without electrifying.

Yield per-square-of panel is not the same as yield per - square of plant.

Correct, you need North-South separation (for Sun-following plants, East-West too). However, just because that, not all the surface you contemplated is 'covered'. For rooftop plants, separation is provided by North-facing roof sides, courtyards, gardens and streets (the latter also for plants installed on highway noise barriers).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 02:26:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series