I don't find the terminology particularly clear. In fact I find that any (country) with enough lawyers can play around with it.
So I agree with santiago below. The direction all this takes is: weaker countries are supposed to open up their markets while the stronger do what they like.
Yes, maybe it's because I'm not used to reading this sort of verbiage, but I got the impression that it was written quite deliberately to be ambiguous and confusing. The march of civilizations is a series of defenses that man has put up against the dread of pure existence.
