Display:
part of the story of how the ERM fell apart. Speculators realized that Germany's Central Bank, which had to do the discounting to maintain the Mark/£ rate, likely would not in fact do it if really pressed
Am I wrong in interpreting that the assumption underpinning the ERM was that it was the job of the smaller EU economies to maintain their exchange rate with respect to the Deutsche Mark within a narrow band?

Isn't such a system inherently stable unless the central bank with the largest currency in the system sees it as its job to curb exchange rate fluctuations?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:39:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... smaller or larger central bank, but that such a system is intrinsically unstable without either:

(1) Strong restrictions on cross-border flows of financial wealth; or

(2) Action by the central bank of the currency facing upward pressure to maintain the exchange rate.

Of course, (1) would be contra to having an Economic Union in the first place, leaving (2).

In that context, it was the Bundesbank that controlled the currency facing upward pressure. If they had stood ready to buy as many £sterling as required to stabilize the rate, the speculative pressure could never have brought down the system.

But "stand ready" means as a priority over whatever the domestic impacts may be ... in a system with freedom of movement of financial wealth, domestic reserves cannot be generated to acquire foreign reserves without those domestic reserves getting out there.

The UK could also have relieved pressure by increasing financial demand for £sterling by raising their cash rate, but for domestic policy reasons were unwilling to do so. Germany could have also relieved pressure by reducing financial demand for Marks by dropping their cash rate, but were unwilling to do so, AFAIU for the same domestic policy reasons that they were unwilling to stabilize the rate directly.

And of course while the Bank of England would have been willing to prop up the £sterling with a "large enough" pool of foreign exchange, a central bank protecting an exchange rate premium sooner or later does not have a large enough pool of foreign exchange.

Hence the Euro: for those EU economies relying primarily on fix-price product sales within the EU, the exchange rate that is never subject to speculative attack is the money:bank-settlement-account exchange rate of 1:1.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:22:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
...smaller or larger central bank but which one is under upwards pressure on the value of its currency.

However, the country with the larger GDP has an easier time dealing with that upwards pressure, in proportion to that GDP (or to the size of its money supply).

So Germany had an easier time defending exchange rate bands than smaller ERM economies.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:44:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The capacity for dealing with it without changing the cash rate is the stock of foreign exchange assets. That's no necessarily in proportion to the size of the domestic GDP.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:54:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But the required change in the cash rate is smaller for the large economy, right?

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:33:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not necessarily, at least not if we are talking about high income economies with populations in the 10m's and more ... there is, after all, more money total to be made in a successful speculative attack in the currency of a larger economy than in a successful speculative attack on the currency of a smaller economy.

I think you are assuming a constant size of the swarm of sharks.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:28:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Touché. I hadn't thought about that.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 04:59:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Neither had I.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 05:20:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series