Display:
The most recent polling I recall on this is from fall 2007, and it's from California - but "medicare for all" had majority support at the time:

Calitics: Interesting Finds on Health Care in the LA Times Poll

Extending Medicare to cover all Americans, creating a government-run system: 53% yes, 36% no

It's not public opinion that is the main obstacle - it is the vast wealth of the insurance industry, which has made both Congress and the White House reluctant to take on more fundamental and more useful reforms.

That decision can be defended. But let's be clear about what drove DC Democrats' decisions on this. It wasn't public opinion.

And the world will live as one

by Montereyan (robert at calitics dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 09:41:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, I agree with you that wealth and power has driven the debate and that it's not all based on the public interest.  I also agree that many DC Democrats are working on that agenda as well.  What I'm disagreeing about is labeling either Obama separately, or together with some Democrats as a monolithic entity, as having the agenda of serving insurance rather than people.  

To call either him as an individual or The Democrats as a singular entity a sell out, to make accusations that the industry wants this bill, that it's a bailout, that they're all engaging in kabuki and serving their 'masters' is really destructive, imo, as well as being generally stupid.

What good does it do?  How does it help us reach our goals?

I think, given the political environment in general and the makeup of the current congress in particular, the bill is a really great start that will help millions.  How are we going to build on that if we keep tearing down those who've helped make it happen?

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes

by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 09:54:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series