Display:
abolishing the private health insurance industry

This is an AHIP fallacy repeated to undermine popular support for public financed insurance as described in H.R. 676. That bill does not compell enrollment in the public plan; nonetheless everyone is eligible to apply for coverage. The bill does not compell persons to terminate private insurance coverage, nor does it prohibit persons from purchasing private insurance. H.R. 676 does prohibit beneficiaries duplication of coverages as do all commercial insurers; all policies contain a coordination of benefits provision to prevent over-insurance i.e. duplicate payments of claims.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Sun Mar 14th, 2010 at 10:51:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, Cat, I know this and, in my view, you're proving my point.  I'm addressing overwrought rhetoric and the dialog that says because of this or that thing, Obama/The Dems are corporate sell outs and traitors to the cause.  All the options would allow our current system to stand.  All the options would require working within it to some extent.  It's ridiculous to be saying, at this point and on these details, that the whole thing is now an insurance bailout/what they wanted all along/Obama's secret master plan.

Maybe we can eventually make language a complete impediment to understanding. -Hobbes
by Izzy (izzy at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 12:21:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series