Display:
I'm sure the administration will row back. There are too many people in DC who like having their fingers on AIPAC's cashflow for the govt to annoy Israel for too long.

After all, what is the US going to do ? Delay those weapons Israel's itching to use on Iran ? I don't think so. Cut off Israel's funding stream ? To frame the question is to recognise the pointlessness of even asking. Not. Gonna. Happen.

So Israel will build and the US will say sorry for being upset when Israel bitch-slapped 'em.

I still say Biden was played by Israel.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 12:43:00 PM EST
And you put it right. It will take a lot of money and a lot of power to get Israel out of our hair, and start it acting like a true democracy instead of an ethnocracy or theocracy which it has become.

Netanyahu just gave the finger to Obama, AGAIN, and will soon fly to Washington to address AIPAC. If I were Hillary, I would just cancel her expected address to these ethnocentric right wing Likud loonies. Let them have Reverend Hagee as a replacement.

by shergald on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 01:00:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm sure the administration will row back.

I'm not so sure. There are some hints, such as the Petraeus report and Biden's reported  outburst, that suggest that the pressure is coming mainly from the U.S. military. I'm not sure what Obama will do, faced with pressure from AIPAC, on the one hand, and the U.S. military on the other. I suspect that the latter might just be more powerful. As the Foreugn Policy source I cited above says:

There are important and powerful lobbies in America: the NRA, the American Medical Association, the lawyers -- and the Israeli lobby. But no lobby is as important, or as powerful, as the U.S. military. While commentators and pundits might reflect that Joe Biden's trip to Israel has forever shifted America's relationship with its erstwhile ally in the region, the real break came in January, when David Petraeus sent a briefing team to the Pentagon with a stark warning: America's relationship with Israel is important, but not as important as the lives of America's soldiers. Maybe Israel gets the message now.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:44:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No. The US are leaving Iraq and so, once that has been completed, I'm sure they'll be happy for Israel to go back to phosphoring Palestinians without hindrance.

The only thing that will matter is if they turn off he money and weapons tap and we know that ain't gonna happen. Sure DC can huff and puff but Netenyahu can yank their chain and they know it.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 03:34:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The US are leaving Iraq

Really? I must have missed that. When? And presumably they want Israel to keep quiet until then.

This may not really be the military applying pressure, of course. These may be coordinated leaks, designed to provide Obama with a backup excuse. He may be testing how powerful the lobby is before deciding what to do. The noise the lobby is making right now may reflect their power, or their weakness; I can't tell. Chances are that Obama will give in, but there may be some point where Israel overreaches, and I suspect we won't know immediately when it happens.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:07:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series