Display:
Tories red-faced after 'Samantha for Labour' gaffe | Politics | The Guardian

David Cameron's aides found themselves performing an unusual damage-limitation exercise when they were forced to deny claims that the Conservative leader's wife, Samantha Cameron, might be voting Labour.

The unlikely allegation came from Ed Vaizey, the Tory arts spokesman and - at least until yesterday - a trusted member of the Cameron inner circle.

One insider said last night that Vaizey was "in the doghouse".

Vaizey made his comment in a Channel 4 programme about Cameron being broadcast tomorrow night which also identifies Samantha as the person who coined the phrase used frequently by Cameron: "There is such a thing as society, it's just not the same thing as the state."



Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 04:39:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So what? Schwarzenegger's wife is a Democrat.

But anything that keeps the Tories from controlling the message in this election campaign is good news.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 04:49:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The term "democrat" is disingenuous when applied to American dynasties. Lets say she ascribes herself to the right, and he, he...
by xurxo on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 05:40:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Are the Tories purposely throwing the election?

I ask since, from this side of the pond, the whole thing has gotten ridiculous.

by ATinNM on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 05:12:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, I don't think they are, it just looks like it.

The problem for them is that for 18 months or so they've gotten away with selling that nice Mr Cameron with the sweet wife and adorable kids (plus unmentioned grief over baby death).

now they've entered the bit where the political bit about what they really believe and what they intend to do comes to the fore. And suddenly all of the vague wishy washy stuff they've been getting away with for the last 18 months isn't working, in fact becomes counter-productive. It's becoming quite obvious that they didn't do their policy homework during this time. They really thought they could just breeze in to the election without giving anything away about their plans and it would be alright.

More fool them. Good. Much as I hate NuLab, the tories are far worse.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 03:41:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They sabotaged their own 2005 campaign as well, with that atrocious Are you thinking what you're thinking where what they were thinking were heartless ugly party slogans.

It's almost as if, when it comes right down to it, the Tories can't help revealing they are bastards and the voters know they really would be a disaster for ordinary people.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 04:00:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
they used to represent crusty empah values, now this modern version, empah-less, looks cruelly redundant.

why, oh why is the brit electorate so hooked on the tory/lab binary?

when i think of how hard it is in america to fly a decent, electorally credible third party, and i see in the UK the work has been done, why don't more vote more for it, if for no other reason than it's not the tweedle dyad.

it's not like they don't have better ideas, they just have a 'fail' aura about them, like it's a foregone conclusion they'll always be stuck at the symbolic, politically powerless level.
 

~"When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate." Karl Jung~

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 06:49:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
why, oh why is the brit electorate so hooked on the tory/lab binary?

Because the Brits haven't got a proportional system.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 08:14:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The original SDP were personally responsible for Thatcher's extended reign. Splitting from Old Lab castrated the party and made it impossible for them to win, even when many, many people had had enough of Her Iron Botoxiness.

The original Libs were the party of Jeremy Thorpe, who remains the only significant British pol in recent history to be put on trial for attempting to murder a lover. (Did he also fiddle his expenses?)

So the fail is strong with them.

It's not that they're disreputable - it's that currently they're not nearly disreputable enough.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 08:52:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
this is an evil plot by evil anglo-saxon speculators to get a hung parliament or some other form of instability/gridlock/political paralysis and speculate against the pound and against UK public debt? There are rich pickings...

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 04:18:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
J dons the tinfoil hat. ;)

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 05:15:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series