Display:
BTW, given other obligations, that diary I promised you may take some time... in the meantime, you can read Why Glaeser Got It Wrong: Re-Running The Numbers On High Speed Rail » INFRASTRUCTURIST, which goes beyond picking apart that old hack job which was brought up again by fairleft in the China HSR diary, by doing a detailed calculation for a Dallas-Houston line.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 03:10:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That's great, exactly the sort of thing I would like to see more of.  Incidentally, he says re CO2 and concrete in construction: "On a somewhat smaller scale, the same can be said for new terminals or runways at airports."  James Strickland showed that the concrete and steel in a single runway corresponds to about 650km of high speed rail (though this was for ballasted track rather than slab construction).
by njh on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 04:22:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I did ad hoc high speed line to airport comparisons in Railways, energy, CO2 - Part 2, too, with much more CO2 for HSR. In that calculation, based on the Frankfurt-Cologne line in Germany (which has slab track), most of the concrete was in tunnel linings, but long bridges (like on Asian lines) would exceed slab track similarly.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 05:11:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That looks great.  One thing to note with steel is that unlike concrete, it can be very efficiently recycled, using little extra CO2.  I wonder if this means we should consider building more with steel and less with concrete (or use steel coated in cement for weather resistance - a few cms of low water/cement mortar can protect steel for hundreds of years.
by njh on Sat Mar 13th, 2010 at 06:23:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There are some good counterstudies in the comments you should read, it seems that the analysis is still rather weak.
by njh on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 04:50:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, it's nowhere near a serious study (like the British HS2 study discussed in another Salon), but it can be called one, while Glaeser's is a joke.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Mar 12th, 2010 at 05:02:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series