Display:
Today, El Pais acts as a vehicle for atlanticist concern-trolling from the US-based German Marshall Fund:

La dudosa voluntad de la Unión de convertirse en potencia global · ELPAÍS.com R. M. DE R. - Córdoba - 07/03/2010   Vota Resultado 10 votos  The Union's dubious will to become a global power - ElPais.com
A José Manuel Durão Barroso le gusta decir que Europa debe decidir si quiere ser el tercero en discordia en el G-2 que se dibuja en el horizonte entre Estados Unidos y China o quedar en los márgenes de la escena global. Con la tinta del Tratado de Lisboa aún húmeda, China dio a Europa una bofetada en la conferencia de Copenhague, y Barack Obama le ha hecho el feo al retrasar hasta finales de año una cumbre UE-EE UU diseñada por la presidencia española de la Unión para mayo.José Manuel Durão Barroso likes to say that Europe must decide whether it wants to be the third member of the G2 which is being delineated on the horizon between the US and China or remain on the margins of the global scene. With the ink of the Treaty of Lisbon still wet, China gave Europe a slap on the face at the Copenhagen [Climate] Conference, and Barack Obama did it the disrespect of delaying to the end of the year an EU-US summit designed by the Spanish EU Presidency for May.
......
La realidad es que las ambiciones de Europa se limitan a su área geográfica inmediata, con Oriente Próximo y África como principales referencias. China, que juega con Europa a placer en función de sus relaciones con los distintos socios, está ausente del pensamiento estratégico de la UE. En las tres horas del examen al que el Parlamento Europeo sometió a Ashton nadie consideró pertinente inquirir sobre China. América Latina es poco más que una anécdota, pese a los esfuerzos españoles por centrar el foco. África atrae mucha ayuda europea, pero la influencia del contacto personal con los líderes francófonos no será lo que pueda explotar la monolingüe Ashton.The reality is that Europe's ambitions are limited to its immediate geographical area, with the near East and Africa as its main points of reference. China, which plays Europe at will as a function of its [bilateral] relationships with the various partners, is absent from the EU's strategic thinking. In the three hours of examination that the European Parliament subjected Ashton to, noone thought it pertinent to enquire about China. Latin America is little more than an anecdote, despite Spain's efforts to center the focus. Africa attracts much European aid, but the influence of personal contact with its francophone leaders is not something the monolingual Ashton can exploit.
......
"Queremos que la UE mire al mundo", dice la responsable del GMF, para quien Afganistán, Irán o la recesión económica global son cargas que Estados Unidos sobrellevaría mejor con ayuda europea. "No hay suficiente Europa", se lamenta. Detecta, sin embargo, corrientes no satisfactorias. "Con George Bush era fácil reducir los problemas a que él no era suficientemente multilateralista. Obama, en cambio, dice cosas que gustan a los europeos. Pero en la relación no hay un problema cíclico sino estructural", diagnostica. "Los americanos tienen una visión del mundo tras el 11-S distinta de la de los europeos. Los dirigentes europeos tienen que explicar el mundo que vivimos, que si están en Afganistán no es por Obama. Ahí es donde tienen que demostrar voluntad política y liderazgo"."We want the EU to look to the world", says [Karen Donfried, vicepresident of the US-based German Marshall Fund (GMF)], for whom Afghanistan, Iran or the global economic recession are burdens that the US would bear better with European help. "There is not enough Europe" she laments. "With George Bush it was easy to reduce the problems to him not being sufficiently multilateralist. Obama, on the other hand, says things that the Europeans like. But the problems with the relationship are not cyclical but structural", she diagnoses. The European leaders have to explain the world we live in, that if they are in Afghanistan it is not for Obama. That's where they have to show political will and leadership".

The idea that the US is shouldering the burden of solving the world's financial crisis, let alone that it is doing it on its own, is laughable. Also, the assumption is that after 9/11 the US view is the correct one and it is the EU that has to catch up and understand the world as it is (that is, as the US sees it). The possibility that the US got it wrong after 9/11 and still hasn't come to its senses is unthinkable to these people.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 05:31:04 AM EST
absolutely correct. america does think it has the answer for everything, including the finance crisis and  terrorism. it is also totally wrong.

Life is not a dress rehearsal
by johnfire (johnfire@christopherrehm.com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 06:08:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The possibility that the US got it wrong after 9/11 and still hasn't come to its senses is unthinkable to these people.

I'd also add that the US still hasn't gotten over the Iranian embassy hostage crisis.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 06:22:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Or Vietnam. Or Korea.
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 08:48:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I did suggest that the US had a list of all perceived slights, injuries and defeats, and was working through them in reverse chronological order, so Iran is next, then Vietnam then North Korea then Germany, and finally at the end of the list (Unless they have to start all over again due to new slights or insults) they will work there way round eventually to England, who were the original people to disagree with America.

Unfortunately whenever I think of that I come to the conclusion that the US government is run somewhat like the U-boat crew in the Dads army episode.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 11:33:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
agreed jerome. but it goes with the inability of americans to look at the world obejctively...

Life is not a dress rehearsal
by johnfire (johnfire@christopherrehm.com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 11:16:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No one looks at the world objectively.

Biases for the US:

  • Even in today's "small" world, we're very isolated culturally.
  • We have military power, which means jingoism has real, negative consequences for the rest of the world.
  • Being a wealthy country, there are few immediate consequences for holding dangerous and damaging narrative beliefs.
  • Addiction to the drug of empire.


you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 01:54:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And a deep-seated cultural mythos of the empty world and infinite horizons.

In fact, it may be argued that the settlement of the Americas, more than anything else, paved the way for the (implicit) assumption in much of economic thought that natural resources were for all intents and purposes in infinite supply. Until the mass settlement of the Americas, the most important raw material constraint on economic activity had been agricultural land. Indeed in many ways agricultural land was the only important raw material constraint on economic activity. With one fell swoop (and judicious application of breech-loaded rifles on recalcitrant natives), this constraint was not merely lifted - it was rendered almost entirely irrelevant, and it would be about two centuries before any equally urgent raw material constraint appeared.

It would be strange indeed if being ground zero for this cosmic shift in the human condition did not have a profound effect on the American cultural myths.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 03:41:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
At the front end, too, it was poor Europeans moving to the US - poor meaning they had nothing, and thus more likely to have a myopic focus on getting "something."

American culture often feels strange to me (even as it's the only culture I have lived) and the "brute force" nature of resource use here is a big part of that. To synthesize a new culture out of this resource abundance would take more generations than we have time for. It could serve as the basis of a serious reduction in violence and competition, but beyond some good ideas on the cultural periphery we've thus far only used it to engage in ever more elaborate games of social status seeking.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 04:09:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not to hand wave the social gains of the 20th century - which wouldn't have happened without all that energy available, but it took more than that. But most of the energy does go toward activities I find useless.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Mar 9th, 2010 at 01:34:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Let's fix this for them:

ChinaThe USA, which plays Europe at will as a function of its [bilateral] relationships with the various partners, is absent from the EU's strategic thinking.


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 06:23:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, but Atlanticists wouldn't want to point that out to their readers, now would they?

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 7th, 2010 at 06:25:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series