Display:
Ron Paul is superficially appealing on a lot of wedge issues.

On the left, he is (or claims to be) against torture, corporate welfare and colonial wars. Sadly, this puts him well ahead of some congresscritters with D after their names.

On the right, he is in favour of killing social security and medicare stone dead, wants to downsize taxes and appeals to the small-minded small-government fanatics.

But one should be careful not to overestimate his base. They are very vocal, and they - like the the disenfranchised left (such as it is and what there is of it) - are pretty savvy at using grassroot media to their advantage. Furthermore, like the Austrians, Creationists and Teabaggers, they have a cadre of fanatics who are very good at making noise and polluting open fora. That cadre also has the rhetorical advantage of having a rather platonic relationship with empirical reality, which makes it easier for them to produce propaganda than it would be for people in the sanity-based community.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 06:11:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That cadre also has the rhetorical advantage of having a rather platonic relationship with empirical reality...

LOL

by ATinNM on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 06:20:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series