Display:
Why would it be in Russia's interests to belong to a club where American ultimately calls the shots?


"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by poemless on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 11:17:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, clearly the proposal we're discussing is a poison pill for Russia. Look at this:
This could include the NATO countries and Russia issuing a joint declaration, at the beginning of the accession process, to use none of their weapons against each other, and that their nuclear weapons serve only one purpose: to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.
So far so good, we won't use our nukes on each other. Then
On this basis, all Russian tactical nuclear weapons could be withdrawn to central storage facilities, where they would be subject to international monitoring at all times, in return for the withdrawal of American nuclear weapons from Europe.
Russia's weapons get mothballed and US ones get simply relocated?
And a joint missile defense system could be installed to protect the territory of NATO countries and Russia.
Why this obsession with a missile defence that doesn't work and with sites owned and operated by the US?

Admittedly this refers only to tactical nukes and not ICBMs, but still, from a Russian perspective it sounds like a poison pill or a Trojan horse.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 11:30:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a blatant Trojan Horse, IMO.

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by poemless on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 11:36:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
LA Times: How to twist Russia's arm: Let it join NATO (August 20, 2008)
Andrew Meier is a former Moscow correspondent for Time magazine and the author of the new book, "The Lost Spy: An American in Stalin's Secret Service."

Anti-Russian fervor threatens to hit fever pitch in Washington this week. In the wake of Russia's military incursion into Georgia, Barack Obama is suddenly doing his best to parrot John McCain's Russophobia. Indeed, the cries to shove Moscow back into the cold are coming from both sides of the aisle: Kick Russia out of the G-8, lock it out of the European Union and the World Trade Organization and, by all means, boycott Vladimir Putin's pet project, Sochi 2014 -- the Winter Olympics slated for a Black Sea venue a short drive from the disputed territory of Abkhazia. On Tuesday, NATO said that continuing normal relations with Russia was impossible and moved to all but scrap the NATO-Russia Council.

Let no one be deceived: Putin has drawn a dangerous new line. Russian troops have trespassed into a sovereign nation for the first time since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. But all such retributive Western campaigns are misguided and, like every attempt to twist Russian arms since the end of the U.S.S.R., sure to backfire.

There's really only one lever left: Invite Russia to join NATO.



En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 8th, 2010 at 11:48:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series