As long as human history has been recorded this has been so.
Square the circle of population growth and you can perhaps square the circle of sustainable growth but, and I overgeneralise of course, oddly enough, those most likely to expound upon the virtues of sustainability, even negative growth, are also those who will, in my part of the world, be those most likely to push the sort of multiculturalism of the sort that accepts, in an otherwise purely secular society founded on equality, women wearing a burkha in a public square or otherwise treated as second class citizens. And we all know that one of the most likely precursors to sustainable populations (short of PRC-style force, which of course these people also tend to eschew) is women's equality, particularly (but not exclusively) via education. Fai de bèn a Bertrand, te lou rendra en cagant
But overpopulation problems could be overrated - and women emancipation is indeed a good factor. The West was never (objectively) close to overpopulation drama. Growing cities and population density only meant higher production and generally better life quality. People were suffering not because of lack of potatoes or something.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
We haven't been trained to it yet.
Women don't naturally want unlimited children.
ACCESS to children, maybe. The village provides.
Hilary Clinton was right. Align culture with our nature.