Display:
All of the UK already has a well defines local Government system, so why not define constituencies by County (which have many traditional and practical identifiers) and only combine Counties where a low population would result in a constituency having less that (say) 3 seats.  Effectively that used to be the case in Ireland, although boundaries have been mucked about since.  Cities could be subdivided into more than one constituency where they exceed (say) 5 seats to retain some level of local identification with candidates.  The larger the constituency, the more it favours larger nationally organised parties over local or single issue candidates with lesser funding/organisation.

Frank's Home Page and Diary Index
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Fri May 14th, 2010 at 04:53:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
On the other hand, the fewer the seats per constituency, the harder for national minor parties to get representation - there was a big difference in the Australian Senate when they went from 5 Senators elected per state each election to 6 elected per state each election, and 7 would be even more dramatic.

So I might put the lower threshold at 4 and the upper threshold at 7 before subdividing down to four each.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri May 14th, 2010 at 12:25:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series