Display:
Can we avoid a lost decade given the debt overhang? Seriously?

Wind power
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 02:25:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What is more painful? What is more fair? A 25% reduction of income and asset values or no income, assets or benefits for the 25% less connected of the population?

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 02:27:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
we can increase taxes.

It's good for budgetary balances.

Wind power

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 02:30:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not on wages, not on mobile capital. So taxes on land values.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 02:33:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Taxes on land values are politically impossible.

But a debt/equity swap would work.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 05:45:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
or make capital less mobile.

A tax on carbon content of imports would do wonders as well.

Wind power

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 05:48:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
make capital less mobile

Cannot do that within the Eurozone.

A tax on carbon content of imports would do wonders as well

Are you really not aware that the problem is internal Eurozone trade imbalances, not the external trade balance of the Eurozone?

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 05:56:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
people chose to vote for right wing policies and ignore the consequences by borrowing unsustainably (or, in the Germans' cases, tightening their belts, relatively speaking, and feeling smug about it).

My friends on the Oil Drum will link that to a last spurt of cheap energy 'probably in the form of the boom in Chinese coal production) which is now over.

Wind power

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 02:28:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Politics is hopeless and so is the European Union's macroeconomic stance. We're going to burn in a flash of self-righteous fiscal austerity.

Look, I don't have any debt but the consequences of waiting for default or 10 years of doldrums to reduce the debt overhand might be that I'd be out of a job soon with no prospects but emigrating to another continent. So I'm willing to endure a loss of purchasing power. After all, my income can support higher taxes, too.

Inflation is destructive of incomes and asset values, deflation is destructive of the human spirit.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 18th, 2010 at 03:12:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series