Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
The point here is that there may well be other interesting information in the price/quantity data than the consumer price index.

Yeah, the lower deciles are probably just too dumb to use available personal services such as chauffeurs and personal shopping assistants, foolishly forgo tax benefits from home ownership, spend most of their transportation budget on public transit, wasting all that time walking from home to the bus stop, etc.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat May 22nd, 2010 at 11:20:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hey, I didn't say that the consumer price index isn't a useful measure.

But, just like GDP (which is also a useful measure) isn't the be-all-end-all measure of economic development, the CPI isn't the be-all-end-all of price indexing.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat May 22nd, 2010 at 07:39:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
My comment was not intended as criticism, but more as commiseration. When we deal with economics we enter the land of the retarded, or perhaps of the autistic. But I am not sure. Do the autistic tend to be religious? I have trouble so imagining.

Were we to classify disciplines by the intellectual approaches employed, economics does not belong in the social sciences. What science starts off with axiomatic assumptions that are presented as self evident and are beyond questioning? Example: "Inflation is everywhere and always a monetary phenomenon." Then consider a situation where simultaneously the creation of all money tokens is stopped and foodstuffs along with energy products become exceedingly scarce, such as after a nuclear exchange or the impact of a large asteroid. One can see that the price of food and energy will go up, but it is not because of the money. Nor can the problem be solved by applying any monetary manipulation that does not produce more food or energy. So obviously the axiom on which monetarists base their analysis is falsifiable. Economics, as currently practiced, should be in the religion departments.

 

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat May 22nd, 2010 at 10:28:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series