Display:
Those were between NATO members. If a NATO member is attacked by a non-NATO member in the Mediterranean the obligations are much clearer. I don't know if Turkey still has in commission some of the former US heavy cruisers we saw around Cyprus years ago, but it likely has a much more formidable navy than Israel, though without the ability to project air power except from Turkey, which is not that far from Gaza.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Jun 2nd, 2010 at 11:36:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm going on the idea that the US is the heavy in NATO, and obviously for the US Israel is untouchable. A kind of defacto NATO satellite.
by Upstate NY on Thu Jun 3rd, 2010 at 01:00:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You know that and I know that and every NATO member knows that.

But it may well be one of those things that everybody can know in private but you can't say out loud.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Jun 3rd, 2010 at 03:16:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We can only hope that members having their noses rubbed in the fact will be eye opening and might lead to some changes. Turkey does have alternatives and could always sign bi-lateral treaties with other NATO members who are willing. Would any be willing? Turkey has a strategic location and is one of the big four or five in NATO in terms of military power. It will be interesting to see what Ergodan does. May be time to press what advantages he can obtain via legal and diplomatic routes while waiting for other opportunities.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Thu Jun 3rd, 2010 at 08:14:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series