The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Not quite. The most obvious difference is an quotation by Nicolas Veron from Bruegel but there's also a summary of El Pais' own reporting from the previous week as well as other information not contained in the Reuters article.
As for the general editorialising tone of El Pais' coverage, there are things like Terrible management at German banks (google translate)
By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
:: :: :: :: ::
As for the end of that article, in Google translate:
...And yet, once again, Germany will have the last word. Merkel gave her support "transparency" involving the testing, but also warned that "details" (which eventually will be released), "the finance ministers decided in Ecofin." In other words, it depends on what his minister Wolfgang Schauble decree on 13 July.
If I read this right, El País is insinuating that Merkel is foreshadowing that Schäuble will water down the transparency in a month. If that's the right reading, then I suspected a misinterpretation already from having read articles on the stress tests two days ago that criticised the EC for not fixing details, so I tried to track this down.
This is obviously an evasion of a question on specific details.
As for what Schäuble's ministry did on the stress test front after the EU summit: going beyond the "if you have nothing to hide..." argument (see this comment of mine), they look for ways to change German law that mandates the tested bank's approval for publication, and Schäuble gave an interview (to another business magazine, the interviewer of which is another automatically blaming Greeks and Spaniards for the situation) in which he insists that the risk of eventual bailouts in the wake of the publication is one to take, one for which the EU has funds ready, and claims that "we won't have to pay in the end" [speak: any run on a bank would be stopped with temporary liquidity injections that are repaid after the bankruptcy is averted].
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by ARGeezer - Dec 15 42 comments
by das monde - Dec 14 14 comments
by LEP - Dec 9 26 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 16 1 comment
by gmoke - Dec 2 7 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 8 16 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 2 33 comments
by rz - Dec 4 15 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by ReGiNuss - Dec 17
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 161 comment
by ARGeezer - Dec 1542 comments
by das monde - Dec 1414 comments
by LEP - Dec 926 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 816 comments
by gmoke - Dec 72 comments
by rz - Dec 415 comments
by gmoke - Dec 27 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 233 comments
by rz - Nov 3071 comments
by Migeru - Nov 2959 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 242 comments
by Cyrille - Nov 247 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 20
by gmoke - Nov 1916 comments