The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Not quite. The most obvious difference is an quotation by Nicolas Veron from Bruegel but there's also a summary of El Pais' own reporting from the previous week as well as other information not contained in the Reuters article.
As for the general editorialising tone of El Pais' coverage, there are things like Terrible management at German banks (google translate)
By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
:: :: :: :: ::
As for the end of that article, in Google translate:
...And yet, once again, Germany will have the last word. Merkel gave her support "transparency" involving the testing, but also warned that "details" (which eventually will be released), "the finance ministers decided in Ecofin." In other words, it depends on what his minister Wolfgang Schauble decree on 13 July.
If I read this right, El País is insinuating that Merkel is foreshadowing that Schäuble will water down the transparency in a month. If that's the right reading, then I suspected a misinterpretation already from having read articles on the stress tests two days ago that criticised the EC for not fixing details, so I tried to track this down.
This is obviously an evasion of a question on specific details.
As for what Schäuble's ministry did on the stress test front after the EU summit: going beyond the "if you have nothing to hide..." argument (see this comment of mine), they look for ways to change German law that mandates the tested bank's approval for publication, and Schäuble gave an interview (to another business magazine, the interviewer of which is another automatically blaming Greeks and Spaniards for the situation) in which he insists that the risk of eventual bailouts in the wake of the publication is one to take, one for which the EU has funds ready, and claims that "we won't have to pay in the end" [speak: any run on a bank would be stopped with temporary liquidity injections that are repaid after the bankruptcy is averted].
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo - Sep 3 85 comments
by marco - Aug 24 26 comments
by car05 - Aug 27 10 comments
by gmoke - Aug 17
by john_evans - Aug 18 26 comments
by Metatone - Aug 14 24 comments
by Helen - Aug 3 38 comments
by DoDo - Sep 385 comments
by car05 - Aug 2710 comments
by marco - Aug 2426 comments
by john_evans - Aug 1826 comments
by gmoke - Aug 17
by Metatone - Aug 1424 comments
by DoDo - Aug 1191 comments
by Helen - Aug 338 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2246 comments