Display:
I think
having a car is not seen as necessary in the U.K.
and
London is not the U.K.
is having your cake and eating it, too.

Either you live in a large, dense, metropolitan area or a car is a necessity.

For instance (from my experience) the periphery of Nottingham requires a car because even in parts served by the local authority's buses they don't run often. According to Wikipedia

Whilst the City of Nottingham has a historically tightly drawn boundary which accounts for its relatively small population of 288,700, the wider Nottingham Urban Area has a population of 667,000 and is the seventh-largest urban area in the United Kingdom, ranking between those of Liverpool and Sheffield.
so, in my book, even "the seventh-largest urban area" in the UK requires a car if you're among the 2/3 of the population not living in the City of Nottingham proper.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jul 6th, 2010 at 07:29:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The report allows for occasional use of taxis as well as public transport.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Tue Jul 6th, 2010 at 07:54:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series