Display:
But that's the question:  In the case of Spain, are the rich really responsible for most of the wealth capture, and who are the rich?  In countries with large public sectors, it is quite possible that the "rich" are part of the public sector and that there just isn't a lot of extra revenue to be found by going after the relatively small numbers of industrial or financial capitalists who are richer still.  Just because taxing capitalists might be the best way to raise funds in the more inequitable Anglo countries, doesn't mean that's the case everywhere else in Europe.
by santiago on Wed Jun 30th, 2010 at 11:59:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
There's not a lot of data easily linked to (I don't have university access) but this paper:

http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/fichero_articulo?codigo=3136587&orden=0

suggests that Spain's top 1% have a similar order of the national wealth (20%) to those in Anglo countries.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Thu Jul 1st, 2010 at 06:19:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Slashing wages by a percentage in public sector looks anyway like a very crude way of addressing a situation if your goal is to have a large share of the burden to fall on the rich.

Better general ways would be:

  • higher taxes on high incomes
  • higher taxes on expensive property

Better specific ways (if public sector is indeed having a lot of fat cats) would be:
  • capping wages in public sector
  • slashing wages among the top 10% of public earners


A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
by A swedish kind of death on Thu Jul 1st, 2010 at 07:13:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I would apply the following levies:

(a) location benefit levy - a tax on land rental values which is essentially a tax on the privileged use of the land commons;

(b) a levy on gross revenues from intellectual property rights - ie a tax on privileged use of the 'creative commons' of knowledge;

(c) a limited liability levy on gross corporate revenues - limited liability is another untaxed privilege;

(d) levies on use of non-renewables - another commons - and so on.

Then I would get rid of all other taxes except levies on earned income aimed at funding education and healthcare.

There is no chance of doing this via the State, since it the privileged turkeys who manage and own the country would not enact Christmas.

But I think in the emerging networked society and economy such an architecture could well evolve.

"Any economic unit can emit money. The serious problem is to get it accepted" Hyman Minsky

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Thu Jul 1st, 2010 at 08:09:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
(b) would mean that a company would have to keep very careful track of exactly who lived where when they were included on a patent application, because it would affect where the payment ended up. Which they already do, but under this system, cheating would be incentivized.
by asdf on Thu Jul 1st, 2010 at 02:46:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series