Display:
One thing Obama is not is a revolutionary.  He always starts with the prevailing consensus as articulated by the powers that be and seeks to reform things from there.  That may be fine in "normal" times.  But in an era of strong tectonic shifts, where existing orthodoxies have fallen over a cliff, such gradualism can actually prologue the ancien regime.

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sun Jul 18th, 2010 at 12:56:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And what makes you think that he doesn't want to prolong the ancien regime?

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Sun Jul 18th, 2010 at 02:11:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If by ancien regime you mean - as I do-= the post Reagon neo-con financial and chickenhawk elite - then he doesn't want to prolong it because he doesn't owe them anything - emotionally, intellectually, politically - and he tried hard to avoid being too financially dependent on them too by organising his own campaign financing org.

Now that the finance reg act has been passed, donations from that quarter have dried up anyway.  If he wants to fund his re-election, he has to look elsewhere.

Index of Frank's Diaries

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Sun Jul 18th, 2010 at 02:26:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
he tried hard to avoid the appearance of being too financially dependent on them too by organising his own campaign financing org.

His hedge fund backers were crucial early and he went to great lengths to advertise his small donor fundraising to divert attention from the continuing, larger contributions from Wall Street. I think you are buying into his PR to an extent.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Jul 18th, 2010 at 09:55:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Fair comment - I was aware of his larger fundraiser base as well - though not its exact sources - apart from Goldmann Sachs.  It would be interesting to know why hedge funds were early backers when Hillary was still regarded as strong favourite - perhaps she wasn't representing New York as they would have wanted.

Nevertheless Politicians stop doing the bidding of early backers all the time - perhaps as an incumbent, Obama now feels he is not as dependent on them.  He certainly won't get their support next time around - so Geithner should be worried as well.  Interesting to see whether Elizabeth Warren gets the big job

Index of Frank's Diaries

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Mon Jul 19th, 2010 at 04:59:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Perhaps, but we still lack any real evidence that he wants to stop doing the bidding of his backers. If regulation isn't comprehensive it won't harm the vampire squids. So why wouldn't they support him the next time?

Wait this is important. Someone is wrong on the Internet.
by generic on Mon Jul 19th, 2010 at 04:04:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series