Display:
FarEasterner, please. If santiago's comments appear neocon-like to you, that is no reason to call him a neocon or ask him if he's John Bolton's deputy.

It's possible to discuss this without name-calling, isn't it?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jul 22nd, 2010 at 12:13:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
this is internet. there is no ban on using word "neocon". if he cares to back his claims he keep repeating in every other post i would be only happy to unravel and show where and how his views are neocon with extensive quotations from speeches of honourable John Bolton and comrades.
by FarEasterner on Thu Jul 22nd, 2010 at 12:27:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's no ban on saying "neocon", but calling the other person a neocon and comparing them to John Bolton would, on many Internet discussion sites as on ET, be called "flaming".

If you want to show what you think is of neocon inspiration in santiago's comments, that is a different matter.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Jul 22nd, 2010 at 12:43:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
really? even if John Bolton himself will appear on ET you would not call him neocon because it will be flaming?
by FarEasterner on Thu Jul 22nd, 2010 at 12:45:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What good does namecalling do? Address the arguments if Bolton had any...

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 22nd, 2010 at 12:47:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
not political correct enough to call spade a spade
by FarEasterner on Thu Jul 22nd, 2010 at 12:50:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The problem is that the shouting match between you and santiago is not very enlightening as to the underlying issue. For instance, for all your criticism of other's imputations of Chinese motivations, you haven't provided your own view of what moves China while suggesting that you have an insight or lack of bias that others lack.

So you calling santiago a neocon doesn't tell me anything about what you think is the correct view of China's motivations, nor what evidence one can get about it from outside.

You can call a spade a spade but the question of what China wants is more interesting than the question of whether santiago is a neocon.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jul 22nd, 2010 at 01:58:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series