Display:
But that assumes there's something happening to invest in, and that the debt payments are converted into credit and/or disposable income.
by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Jul 19th, 2010 at 07:02:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
mmm, what it assumes is either
  1. ECB "prints" fiat to pay Chinese BONDHOLDERS;
  2. or EP taxes the living BEJEEBUS out of earned income to pay Chinese BONDHOLDERS

or not: Work the WTO room to extort trade "balance"

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Mon Jul 19th, 2010 at 07:16:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I did say one possibility was to use all that Chinese money to buy iPods (designed in California, built in China). That would be bad.

We could also make a determined push to change our economic model. That requires the political will to direct the economy in a particular direction, and to invest.

But, in any case, we would be allowing China to do our deleveraging for us.

In other words, borrowing from china what we'd otherwise borrow form each other (even if that borrowing is just rolling over of past debt) is a net positive. But we can use this for our long-term benefit or just piss it away and have another crisis a few years down the line.

By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jul 19th, 2010 at 07:21:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series