Display:
"and urged offsetting the move with increased revenue or lower spending"

Great. Since it has been shown that, amongs the various ways that the Government can spend money, the Bush tax cuts are pretty much the least efficient in terms of stimulus, this would mean replacing a more efficient stimulus by a Bush tax cut.

All in the name of helping the economy of course. But it's pure starving the beast and ensuring that the rich get richer.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Sun Jul 25th, 2010 at 02:39:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
All in the name of helping the economy of course. But it's pure starving the beast and ensuring that the rich get richer

but as far as Bernanke is concerned, the whole of the US economy is about Wall street. so anything that is good for Wall St makes the economy better. As good a definition of the triumph of the economic parasite as we're gonna get.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Jul 25th, 2010 at 06:32:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series