Display:
No.

They get less light (consider that in summer they only get sin(theta) light compared with cos(theta) light for a horizontal garden, require much more infrastructure (you need to hold the plants up, get water to them, complex equipment to pick food).

I've built many over the years, they are nice to look at, they protect the walls from the weather, they can cool the house (though much less efficiently than putting reflective foil on the wall) and they are fun to make.

But they're not going to save the world.  Sorry about that.

by njh on Thu Jul 29th, 2010 at 07:54:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If the goal is to "save the world" let's put the horse in front of the cart.  Find a way to limit and decrease the world population first because no amount of food production will offset an open-ended population number.  My best example ... dry yeast added to a cup of warm sugar water in prep to make bread. The yeast grows until it runs out of sugar or dies in its waste (ethanol).  And humans don't seem to control their population numbers any better than little yeasties.

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Fri Jul 30th, 2010 at 06:59:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
without wishing to sound eager or ghoulish, but I think that we're going to see a lot of dying before 2050.

The climate seems to be on a tipping point right now and food production will probably collapse from under us.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri Jul 30th, 2010 at 07:04:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series