On August 3, Germany's Constitutional Court ruled that "the current legal situation excessively encroached on paternity rights for fathers of children born out of wedlock, because they could only take part in raising the child with the mother's consent," according to spokeswoman Judith Blohm.The constitutional court ruled that fathers should have the same rights as mothers Blohm said that until now "the fathers also didn't have the right to have a court determine what arrangement was in the best interest of the child."
The constitutional court ruled that fathers should have the same rights as mothers
Blohm said that until now "the fathers also didn't have the right to have a court determine what arrangement was in the best interest of the child."
So what's wrong with this decision?
to fight to keep unfit fathers from raising their children
What about unfit mothers? "Ce qui vient au monde pour ne rien troubler ne mérite ni égards ni patience." René Char
In these cases, a judicial decision (by the foreign authorities) to give the father rights was overruled by the german court. A free fox in a free henhouse!
when the biological parent with the most wealth is the father, that could empower him to intimidate and manipulate the mother via legal processes
Or so the story goes on some solicitors' websites... By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
