Display:
And since the added value created by the organisation, brand and power is, in a bank, substantial, the shareholders' apparent return on capital is substantial.

If they have low wages, relative to "added value," that just means there is an oversupply of labour.

There is no lack of labour, return on capital is 1000% and a country of 5 million has just 4 banks?
Of course, the reason for these profits is clear:

Banking is a government created monopoly.
Free lunch to stock owners.

by kjr63 on Wed Sep 1st, 2010 at 07:11:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No, it means that you're committing the same fallacy as the neo-classicals. You are neglecting a factor of production: Financial assets. Trust. Institutional stability. Confidence in the present value of promises pertaining to the future.

In many cases, this doesn't matter, because in many cases money is not the limiting factor of production. But it is when dealing with the financial system, and its interaction with the rest of the economy.

- Jake

If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Sep 2nd, 2010 at 03:02:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series