Display:
But CEO's in the US do not get paid primarily in stock, they get paid primarily in stock options. If the option is to buy stock at $50/share, and the stock is at $48, nothing is lost in those options from the stock dropping by $8, and a great deal is gained in those options from the stock rising by $8.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 01:44:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Really? And here I thought everyone knew that handing out stock options to CEO's is an insane way of rewarding management, as it disaligns the interests of shareholders with that of the management. It for example shifts the focus from dividends to share buybacks, among other things.

Really, doesn't everyone know this? I read of it (for abouth the thosandth time) as late as a few days ago, in  a book I just bought.


Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 01:56:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Hence the occasionally discussed agency problem in corporate governance. In theory, corporate officers should be selected by and accountable to the shareholders, but this is rarely the case in practice. Just another one of those problems, about which we seem never able to do anything effective. Now the SEC is supporting a rule that allows any group that holds 3% of the stock of a publicly traded corporation to be able to propose candidates for the board of directors. We will see if this holds and if it makes any difference.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 09:38:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series