Display:
If the LebDems had been seen right after the last election as being responsible for sending the country straight back to the polls, I reckon they'd have been hammered.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 04:43:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Not to mention that they have no money left to campaign.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 06:05:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... had I had a clue that it was the case.

Thanks.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 09:00:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
One could just as well argue that it would be the Tories/Labour that would send the country back to the polls, by refusing to accept a referendum on a reasonable election system.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Mon Aug 30th, 2010 at 05:53:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But being the smallest party there would be much less newspaper exposure for their point of view. both other parties would have pushed the idea that they pushed for their narrow political interest where the most important thing was the current financial situation. Not a good electoral position for a third party to be in.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Aug 30th, 2010 at 07:49:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series