Display:
Study recommends extending nuclear plant lifetimes | Germany | Deutsche Welle | 28.08.2010
A study commissioned by the German government has recommended an extension of up to 20 years to the life nuclear power plants, according to reports. The government faces resistance if it presses ahead. 

Experts from Germany's Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI) were asked to give their advice to the government on a range of scenarios about extending the operational lifetimes of plants by 4, 12, 20 and 28 years.

 

The study recommended that nuclear power plants should be kept open for between 12 and 20 years more than currently planned, the German news magazine Focus reported Saturday.

 

A number of studies, many of which have come to different conclusions, have been recently issued by think-tanks and environmental organizations.

 

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 03:14:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Prolonging nuclear power may stymie investment into renewables | Business | Deutsche Welle | 26.08.2010
A new report has outlined why ending the use of nuclear energy matters for the development of renewable energy infrastructure. Its sponsors say the nuclear power fight is post-war Germany's largest-ever economic dispute. 

In the midst of an ongoing debate over whether to extend the lifespan of Germany's 17 nuclear power plants, a new report has revealed that the continued availability of nuclear power would likely cause a decrease in investment into renewable energies.

Increases in wind and solar energy capacities will eventually lead to nuclear power plants being used less, the report states. The reason: energy from renewable sources enjoys legal priority over nuclear and coal power. It is fed into the grid before electricity from non-renewable sources.

As the capacity of electricity from wind or solar sources increases, conventional electricity sources will only be needed to fill in gaps when there is a lack of wind or sun. But it takes about 50 hours to restart a nuclear power plant that has been completely shut down, meaning it would be necessary to keep the plant running at 50 or 60 percent capacity.

Gas powered turbines, however, can be turned on within 20 minutes and can also be run on biogas. Other possibilities to bridge fluctuations in renewable electricity output include the decentralized approach of using micro-power stations or accessing the batteries of electric cars.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sat Aug 28th, 2010 at 03:15:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
  1. renewables represent 10% of power generation right now. To get to the point where it would be such a large part of the system that it would actually require shutting down nuclear plants completely on more than an exceptional basis is unlikely for a while (or if it happens, it will be because the grid has been substantially modified to make it possible) - or is the journalist expecting the nuclear plants to be shut before the coal plants? (that's the assumption of the report, actually, from what's quoted in the article)

  2. even if, somehow, renewables lost their priority access to the grid (which would require a much more significant change in law than an extension of the life of the nuclear plants), there is no reason they would not still be dispatched: renewables have lower marginal costs than nuclear plants and will underbid them easily...

  3. and when they discuss a report on anything, why don't they f*cking provide alink to the said report so that we can check for ourselves?


Wind power
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sun Aug 29th, 2010 at 05:32:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Too much money, geopolitics and power at stake. You don't want the facts to get in the way of a good narrative, now do you?

Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.
by Bernard on Sun Aug 29th, 2010 at 06:09:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
they say the report is by EWI, who are primarily a security advisory body who, despite their name (East-West Institute)seem very NATO focussed. They also seem to carry a lot of baggage for the nuclear industry.

So I imagine that somebody helpfully wrapped all this up to provide the most helpful pro-nuclear spin where, and I know you disagree with this, nuclear vs DFH-energy is a zero-sum game. So there will always be an element of punch-a-hippy about such things.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Aug 29th, 2010 at 06:09:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Energiekonzerne sponsern Gutachter | RP ONLINEEnergy giants sponsor examiners
Unmittelbar vor der Übergabe der entscheidenden Studie über das Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung geraten die Gutachter selbst in die Kritik: Das Energiewirtschaftliche Institut (EWI) der Universität Köln, eines der drei beauftragten Institute, erhielt Geld von den Energiekonzernen Eon und RWE. Die Unternehmen unterstützen das EWI mit jeweils vier Millionen Euro. SPD und Grüne rügten den Vorgang scharf. Das Kölner Institut wies die Vorwürfe zurück.Just before submission of the decisive study of the energy concept of the German federal government, the experts themselves are coming in for criticism: the Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI), one of the three institutes commissioned, received money from energy giants Eon and RWE. The companies support the EWI with four million euros each. SPD and Greens sharply criticized this conduct. The Cologne-based institute rejected the accusations.


The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Aug 29th, 2010 at 06:50:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series