. . . the deeper and very real problem is that below the water line is a huge mass of voters who have returned to their position of alienation from the political process as a result of Obama's failures.
Why is greatre popular enlightenment on the political process a problem? Voters are pushed again up against the hard truth: it's a pay to play system and those who can't pay are chumps. Only moving forward after first understanding that reality, voters and former voters now need to work out how they're gonna change the political process so it actually becomes reasonably democratic. I don't think anyone actually has any idea how citizens are gonna do that 'within the political process', but I'm just sayin'. . . . fairleft
The GOP has managed to capture and stoke the anger of their base. The Dems are woefully out of touch with their base and haven't.
The current crop of Dem pols have forgotten, if they ever knew, how to do retail (precinct) politics. Until they get over themselves they won't learn.
Obama showed that another way was possible, but as we now know without any doubt, he was never committed to the grassroots-supported model of political campaigns. And in return, the grassroots is starting to desert him. Even OFA (Organizing For America, the remnant of the 2008 Obama For America campaign organization that was absorbed into the DNC after the election) has seen a huge dropoff on the number of volunteers it gets for its activities and a big unsubscribe rate in its emails (they used to have a list of 13 million, but I'd be surprised if they get 1 million people regularly reading what they send out).
And that's because Obama revealed himself to be an acolyte of Reagan and Clinton, someone who believes deeply in the righteousness of the elite and who disdains populist concerns. Hopefully the wreckage of the November 2010 elections can become creative destruction instead of plain old destruction, and fuel some better and smarter progressive activism. And the world will live as one
Wikileaking will not stop the war in Afghanistan; truth telling and punditeering can play only an antiwar support role. They are supposed to support a robust antiwar movement, by a citizenry angry about its young men and women getting killed for no reason, angry about killing Afghanistan civilians for no good reason, angry about wasting half a trillion dollars a year on military imperialism when that money needs to be spent at home, and then expressing that anger massively and in ways that cannot be ignored.
http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2010/8/24/14490/3940 fairleft